health bureaucrats play God
Cerise claims that health bureaucrats are playing God with our lives depending on where in our bodies we develop cancer. They are using moral judgments concerning who lives and who doesn’t.
"For instance, as long as the bureaucrats hang on to their dogmatic belief that lung cancer is a dirty disease caused by smoking, then patients with it deserve to die," says Cerise. “It is not only funds to save lives that will be withheld. Funds for medical research to find other causes for lung cancer will also be withheld."
"It is almost as if these anti-smoking bureaucrats have a vested interest in upholding their flat earth world view about lung cancer," says Cerise. "Imagine how their world would crumble if some maverick medical researcher discovered a new cause for the disease?"
"Can't have that, they'd say! The research was flawed, they'd say! The researcher is a tobacco company stooge, they'd say!" laughs Cerise. "It's no laughing matter, I know, but when these people claim that every conceivable disease known to man has links to tobacco smoking you really get to wonder about their credibility."
"In the meantime, thousands of poor people with lung disease are dying prematurely because health policy advisors on highly lucrative salaries refuse to allow them to be given lifesaving drugs," says Cerise. "You wouldn't treat a dog like that, so why are smokers -- who just happen to get lung cancer -- treated so badly?"
"Sure, smokers get lung cancer," says Cerise, "but so do people who have never smoked in their lives and, to support their theory that only smoking causes the disease, health authorities then claim that these people must have been exposed to passive smoking. Their eyes are blinkered as to other causes."
"They have demonized lung cancer to such an extent that it has become a dirty disease, a smokers' disease, one that nobody wants to treat nor should treat because it wouldn't exist as a disease if it were not for smokers and their filthy, dirty habit," says Cerise. "They are making a moral decision about a particular cancer as if it were totally unrelated to other cancers, and they are deliberately withholding lifesaving drugs for lung cancer patients.”
“In years to come when nobody smokes – and lung cancer remains a leading cause of death,” says Cerise, “the health bureaucrats will be forced to admit the possibility that something else – maybe air pollution – causes lung cancer in susceptible patients; but by then it will be too late to apologize to the poor wretches who were denied life-saving treatment because they smoked.”
Read more by Cerise on this subject:
denial of life-saving drugs
everything is killing us!
"For instance, as long as the bureaucrats hang on to their dogmatic belief that lung cancer is a dirty disease caused by smoking, then patients with it deserve to die," says Cerise. “It is not only funds to save lives that will be withheld. Funds for medical research to find other causes for lung cancer will also be withheld."
"It is almost as if these anti-smoking bureaucrats have a vested interest in upholding their flat earth world view about lung cancer," says Cerise. "Imagine how their world would crumble if some maverick medical researcher discovered a new cause for the disease?"
"Can't have that, they'd say! The research was flawed, they'd say! The researcher is a tobacco company stooge, they'd say!" laughs Cerise. "It's no laughing matter, I know, but when these people claim that every conceivable disease known to man has links to tobacco smoking you really get to wonder about their credibility."
"In the meantime, thousands of poor people with lung disease are dying prematurely because health policy advisors on highly lucrative salaries refuse to allow them to be given lifesaving drugs," says Cerise. "You wouldn't treat a dog like that, so why are smokers -- who just happen to get lung cancer -- treated so badly?"
"Sure, smokers get lung cancer," says Cerise, "but so do people who have never smoked in their lives and, to support their theory that only smoking causes the disease, health authorities then claim that these people must have been exposed to passive smoking. Their eyes are blinkered as to other causes."
"They have demonized lung cancer to such an extent that it has become a dirty disease, a smokers' disease, one that nobody wants to treat nor should treat because it wouldn't exist as a disease if it were not for smokers and their filthy, dirty habit," says Cerise. "They are making a moral decision about a particular cancer as if it were totally unrelated to other cancers, and they are deliberately withholding lifesaving drugs for lung cancer patients.”
“In years to come when nobody smokes – and lung cancer remains a leading cause of death,” says Cerise, “the health bureaucrats will be forced to admit the possibility that something else – maybe air pollution – causes lung cancer in susceptible patients; but by then it will be too late to apologize to the poor wretches who were denied life-saving treatment because they smoked.”
Read more by Cerise on this subject:
Labels: cancer, health bureaucrats, playing God
<< Home