Boikott Israel?

When the news of Norway’s massacre on 22 July 2011 came through the knee jerk response from the media was that it was an Al Qaeda attack – and then it transpired that Breivik was a sole perpetrator, a Christian ethnic Norwegian seeking to halt Islamic immigration and restore core European values – and now that she has had time to reflect on the evidence Dakota is wondering whether there’s something else going in view of the fact that the kids at the camp were boycotting Israel. Was Breivik a secret Israeli operative?

“That photograph of the two Norwegian boys holding up a huge ‘Boikott Israel’ banner in front of their tent to honor a visit by Foreign Minister, Jonas Gahr Store, the day before the massacre, strikes me as being incredibly inflammatory and out of place in Norway,” says Dakota. “What on earth has Norway got to do with Israeli-Palestinian political and religious strife?”

“We are told that the Norwegian Foreign Minister addressed the cheering campers with a rousing speech about the Palestinians who ‘must have their own state, the occupation must end, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now’,” says Dakota, “and afterwards the campers staged a game of ‘Unlock the Gaza Blockade’ by designing and crafting their own mock ships, waving Palestinian flags and re-enacting the Hamas flotilla in which terrorists tried to murder Israeli soldiers.”

“Obviously, Utoya was no normal summer camp and these kids were not normal kids, and if they were too young to understand how inflammatory their actions would be seen by Israelis then their party leaders and parents need to take responsibility for indoctrinating them in matters beyond their years.”

“Utoya was, in fact, a Worker’s Youth League (AUF) political camp,” says Dakota, “and the kids were mainly the sons and daughters of Norway’s elite ruling Labour Party who were being ‘groomed’ to become the next generation of political rulers.”

“These kids were so indoctrinated in the internationalist politics of their parents that when the massacre happened many thought it was part of the ‘game’ they were playing,” sighs Dakota. “They thought that Breivik was playing the part of an Israeli soldier and some lost their lives by actually approaching him for a talk.”

“What should have been a Norwegian tragedy – a misfit Norwegian attacking his own people – has now escalated into claims by Israelis that these kids were playing anti-Semitic war games with a pro-Islamic agenda,” says Dakota, “and commentator Glenn Beck muddied the waters even further by suggesting that the camp was similar to Hitler’s Youth camps.”

“Actually, the roots of the Workers Youth League are Communist, not Nazi,” explains Dakota. “Norway’s Labour Party was a member of the Communist International and AUF was formed by the merger of the Left Communist Youth League and the Socialist Youth League of Norway.”

“The internationalist Leftists of the world desperately want to keep the issue a ‘local’ one, but, let’s face it, their agenda is global and the Utoya youth camp has had a 15-year relationship with Fatah Youth in Palestine which, following the massacre, sent condolences to its AUF ‘comrades’.”

“Israelis point out that Breivik’s attack on the Utoya youth camp has a precedent in the Maalot Massacre when Palestinian terrorists attacked an Israeli elementary school using automatic weapons to kill as many of them as they could,” says Dakota. “They also point out AUF’s long history of supporting the same kind of terrorists who had perpetrated the Maalot Massacre, particularly that of Lars Gule, the Secretary General of the Norwegian Humanist Association and former leader of the AUF at the University of Bergen, who had been trained in terrorism by the perpetrators of the Maalot Massacre.”

“Norway’s ambassador to Israel was careful to distinguish between the Utoya attack and the terrorist attacks on Israelis,” says Dakota, “but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was not – saying ‘We in Israel completely identify with this disaster ... We have experienced it from other directions and we know the families’ and the nation’s agony’.”

“The Israelis see Breivik as following the terrorist example of Lars Gule and sharing the intellectual legacy of Norwegian foreign policy dominated by a Marxist political left which endorses violence as a legitimate tool of political change,” says Dakota, “and they claim that Norway’s Foreign Minister, Gahre Store, followed in the footsteps of countless previous ministers opening Norway’s doors to all sorts of Islamist terrorist groups – calling for negotiations with Al-Shahaab in Somalia (an Al-Qaeda offshoot); negotiating with Hamas leader Khaled Mashal; and calling for a reconciliation with the Taliban.”

“What the Marxist political left does not understand, Israelis argue, is that Hamas is not just against Israel,” says Dakota. “It is against all Jews, and all Christians.”

“Breivik, they argue, understood how dangerous Hamas is and when his government openly supported terrorists which kill Israelis he felt no compunction about killing the next generation of Norway’s Left which would perpetuate this situation,” says Dakota, “and in saying this they somehow implicate Breivik as some sort of secret Israeli operative – and I find that difficult to believe – although anything, of course, is possible.”

“By devolving the issue into a Jewish v Muslim war, what the Israelis fail to comprehend is that it’s possible to be against the policies of Israel without being anti-Semitic,” says Dakota, “but as was the case with George Bush – the old ‘if you’re not with us, you’re against us’ rhetoric just can’t go away – and by negotiating with Islamic terrorists the Norwegians were falling into this trap.”

“Norway’s Foreign Minister, Jonas Gahr Store, made what can be construed as an inflammatory speech against Israel at Utoya, and incited an inflammatory pro-Palestine protest by the children at the camp – no two ways about it,” says Dakota, “but whether Breivik was a secret Israeli operative, or merely a tool which the Israeli media used to draw attention to Norway’s complicity in the Palestine cause, is moot.”

“There were 359 references to Israel in Breivik’s manifesto, but apparently he had never personally visited Israel,” says Dakota. “Being anti-Muslim doesn’t necessarily make him pro-Jewish, but he was so screwed up by what was happening in Norway under the Labour Government that he may have had made secret contacts with Israelis.”

“Basically, had Norway been looking after its own affairs and its own screwed up people like Breivik rather than meddling in international affairs many young lives could have been saved.”

Read more by Dakota:

The ethics of politicizing children
Breivik’s online fantasy world
Dating psychos like Breivik
Breivik’s social contract betrayal
Breivik’s July 22 Sarajevo Code
Breivik the white knight
Breivik, Christ’s Knight
Stepfamily loners
be proud of your race!
immigration promotes white shame?

See also:

Age Secrets of Anders Behring Breivik
Breivik’s Aquarian Humanity?