Norway's globalist politicians

The atrocity committed by the Norwegian, Anders Behring Breivik, put the spotlight on a small country that, surprisingly, plays a very large part in global politics; and that the assassin’s target was Gro Harlem Brundtland – currently a Special Envoy on Climate Change for the United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon – caused Dakota to wonder what it was about that lady that Breivik hated so much, and how she ended up as a globalist politician.

“Brundtland, born 20 April 1939, has such an impressive history of achievements that it is easy, perhaps, for any man to envy her or feel emasculated by her – but obviously her husband did not, basking in her reflected glory to such a degree that he wrote two books about her,” says Dakota. “But because Breivik saw feminism –and feminized men - as one of the curses visited upon his country, and the world, by her generation of ‘cultural Marxists’, it is obvious why he made her a prime target for his hate.”

“From the beginning, Brundtland was a strong advocate of women's rights and as the Norwegian Labor Party’s spokesperson on abortion, she enabled law changes liberating women from unwanted pregnancies and domestic servitude,” says Dakota. “Breivik no doubt blamed her for Norway’s low ethnic birth rate and the rise of immigration in his country - a trend common across western nations.”

“In Trygve Bratelli’s Labour government, Brundtland held a post that no woman had ever previously held - environmental minister for the country,” says Dakota, “and this strikes me as odd because her qualifications were in medicine and public health – but when you consider that Breivik listed environmentalists as eco-Marxists whose true agenda is to create a world government led by the UN you can understand why Brundtland moved into that area.”

“As environmental minister – as well as becoming deputy leader in 1975, the International Year of the Woman – she came to prominence in 1977 when an explosion caused a serious spill at an oil drilling platform in the North Sea,” says Dakota. “She made environmental issues –and herself - very prominent for the voters of the country by speaking out against further drilling expansion in the North Sea, and she was also against damming any more rivers to produce hydroelectric power.”

“In 1981 Brundtland became Norway’s first woman prime minister and, at 42, she also became the youngest person to hold that office,” says Dakota, “but she made a mess of things and was thrown out of office within the year, shortly to start a career in global politics.”

“Impressed by her environmental activism, the United Nations Secretary General gave her the job of chairing the World Commission on Environment,” says Dakota, “and among the 21 representatives she chose to form the commission, holding its first meeting in Switzerland in 1984, was a Canadian entrepreneur, Maurice Strong, (now a Beijing resident).”

“In 1986, Brundtland became prime minister of Norway a second time, with 8 of 18 cabinet members being women,” says Dakota, “and in the same year Maurice Strong’s water development company lost in a bid to pump water underground in Colorado which would have caused ‘significant environmental damage to nearby wetland and sand dune ecosystems by reducing the flow of surface water’- so much for his environmental credentials!”

“The last meeting of the World Commission on Environment and Development - aka the Brundtland Commission - took place in 1987 in Japan,” says Dakota. “This commission provided momentum for the infamous Agenda 21 - and it was decided to have another talk fest in five years time at the 1992 Earth Summit in Brazil, headed by Maurice Strong, where leaders from almost 200 countries attended.”

“Breivik’s manifesto quotes Maurice Strong’s opening remarks at the 1992 Earth Summit as proof that environmentalists are Marxists – ‘Isn’t it the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse? Isn’t it part our responsibility to bring that about?’ – and the way they will achieve the West’s downfall is by transferring wealth to the developing nations (i.e. China, where Strong resides) by carbon taxes.”

“In the meantime, Brundtland was re-elected Norwegian prime minister in 1990,” says Dakota, “but her main focus remained on international politics – traveling worldwide promoting environmental issues, population control and the elimination of poverty – the highlight of which came in 1994 she delivered the opening day speech at the UN Population Conference in Egypt.”

“Brundtland’s crowning success in international politics came in 1998 when she was made Director-General of the World Health Organization under Kofi Annan - a post she held until 2003 – despite suffering from uterine cancer in 2002,” says Dakota. “In this post she gained prominence for changing the focus of public health to lifestyle issues and adopting a macroeconomic approach to health – reducing mankind to ‘homo economicus’, nothing more than a worker and a consumer, which is another gripe from Breivik’s manifesto.”

“So, from 1998 to 2003 Brundtland was the prime force behind the worldwide movement to achieve the abolition of cigarette smoking,” explains Dakota, “and under her leadership the WHO became the first employer to discriminate against smokers – a measure which may have affected Breivik, a smoker, personally.”

“At the same time, her good friend, Maurice Strong, became Kofi Annan’s personal envoy but was forced to step down from his post in 2005 after the Oil-for-Food scandal and hiring practice criticisms showed alleged evidence of his corruption.”

In 2007, the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon made Brundtland a UN Special Envoy for Climate Change – a post she continues to hold as well as working for Pepsi as a consultant,” laughs Dakota. “I have to laugh because isn’t there an incongruity between Pepsi and her former role with WHO, especially as Norway ranks 4th in the world for soft drink consumption?”

“Now 72, Brundtland shows no signs of wearying,” says Dakota. “She is a member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters and the Norwegian Humanist Association (the Secretary General of which is Lars Gule, a former leader of the AUF (which the massacred children belonged to) who had been trained in terrorism by the perpetrators of the Maalot Massacre in Israel).

“She is also a member of the Council of Women World Leaders, the Club of Madrid, the Bilderberg meetings, and The Elders (formed by Nelson Mandela on the occasion of his 89th birthday in 2007 and funded by Richard Branson, Peter Gabriel, Ray Chambers, Michael Chambers, Bridgeway Foundation, Pam Omidyar, Humanity United, Amy Robbins, Shashi Ruia, Dick Tarlow and the United Nations Foundation).

“Still married to fellow humanist Arne Olav Brundtland since 1960, she has four children and, like many Norwegian Labour politicians, they own a house in the south of France – as does Breivik’s natural father,” says Dakota, “and it is ironic that she had an operation for uterine cancer in 2002 at a Norwegian hospital when she was resident in France – breaching her ‘homo economicus’ health directive about social security benefits.”

“Bowing to intense media pressure in 2008 about where her allegiances lie, Brundtland has since resumed residence in Norway and intends to repay her health costs,” says Dakota, “but it would have been better for her, and Norway, had she stayed in the south of France rather than continuing her internationalist politics in a land which, under her governance, had contaminated the pure spirit of Norwegian culture with Marxist philosophy and created such a reactionary man as Breivik.”

“A young Breivik, witnessing the rise of Islamism within the western world, but most particularly the complicity of his government in the selling out of fellow Christians in Serbia in 1999, pandering to the Muslims over the Muhammad cartoons and awarding the Peace Prize to Arafat (an Islamic terrorist) saw all of this as the act of traitors.”

“That Brundtland owes her life to a traffic jam – preventing Breivik from reaching her before she gave a speech on Utoya Island to the unfortunate AUF child campers – is something she will no doubt ponder upon for the rest of her life.”

Read more by Dakota:
Was Breivik a secret Israeli operative?
The ethics of politicizing children
Breivik’s online fantasy world
Dating psychos like Breivik
Breivik’s social contract betrayal
Breivik’s July 22 Sarajevo Code
Breivik the white knight
Breivik, Christ’s Knight
Stepfamily loners
be proud of your race!
immigration promotes white shame?

See also:

Age Secrets of Anders Behring Breivik
Breivik’s Aquarian Humanity?

The ethics of politicizing children

Following the slaughter of so many young campers at the Worker’s Youth League (AUF) political camp on the Norwegian island of Utoya on 22 July 2011, many commentators around the world have questioned the ethics of politicizing children (the youngest at Utoya being 14) in camps designed to groom them as potential future leaders; and Dakota is shocked that Norway has not only dismissed this concern but is also adamant about continuing what she, and others, considers to be an unethical tradition.

“Apparently all seven parties in Norway's parliament have active youth wings – as do other Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands and Germany,” says Dakota. “To me, and others, the very notion of sending a child to a political youth camp smacks of indoctrination, and no matter what the Norwegians say I do not believe it is ethical to involve children in politics until they are old enough to vote and form opinions for themselves.”

"Claims that these youth groups are promoting their own ideas, rather than spouting the politics of their parents is a joke,” says Dakota. “The ruling party Labor youth group has a massive 9,500 members, all of whom support the cultural Marxism of the Labour Party; and the center-right Young Liberals, numbering just 1,000, support the sort of ideals, but not as extremist, as those that Anders Behring Breivik espoused.”

"The kids were killed not because they liked politics but because they were gathered together like sitting ducks on an island playing adult political games – with high profile targets like Foreign Minister, Jonas Gahr Store, and former Prime Minister, Gro Harlem Brundtland, visiting the camp," says Dakota. “Had they been doing what normal kids do, enjoying their summer holidays at home, at the beach, in the streets or in the malls, none of this would have happened.”

“Actually, there are reports that Breivik had planned to be at Utoya while Gro Harlem Brundtland was visiting the island but had been delayed,” says Dakota, “so it’s very likely that she was his target for any number of reasons - she was a former head of the WHO responsible for shifting that organization’s emphasis towards lifestyle issues; a UN global climate change enforcer; and a mobile phone causing brain cancer alarmist – and missing her by minutes Breivik may have turned on the kids instead.”

"Young people are generally not interested in politics and those that are usually have a pushy parent behind them,” says Dakota, “and that the kids at Utoya were the children of the ruling Labour Party and its bureaucracy determined to keep their power intact – not ordinary kids from all walks of life - makes sense, doesn’t it?”

“The Young Liberals are going ahead with their political camp because they do not want to live in fear and somehow believe they can influence the Norwegian Labour dominated parliament from reducing personal freedom and individual responsibility any more than it has already – already there’s talk of banning video games and guns and installing more security cameras,” says Dakota, “but if they really believe in freedom and individuality then they should be seriously reconsidering why they need to meet in this fashion.”

“If this strange tradition of political youth camps must be continued,” says Dakota, “then the age of its members should be raised to at least 18 to ensure that everyone participating has the maturity to understand what they are doing, why they are doing it and the possible repercussions that may ensue from such activities.”

“Politics is not a game, especially international politics such as that played out by those unfortunate Norwegian kids in Utoya,” says Dakota. “All of the adults involved in arranging the Israel protest at Utoya, especially the visiting Foreign Minister, Jonas Gahr Store for inciting it, need to be held to account.”

“No child under the age of 18 should be subjected to political indoctrination,” says Dakota, “and if the Norwegian Labour Party had kept its children out of adult politics, allowing them to enjoy their teen years without hateful and inflammatory indoctrination, then maybe this freedom could very well have resulted in their children forming different political allegiances that may have ended the Labour Party’s long and not very glorious rule, but at least their children would be alive today.”

“Fourteen year old Norwegian kids waving Palestinian flags and chanting ‘boycott Israel’ is really beyond the pale.”

Read more by Dakota:
Was Breivik a secret Israeli operative?
Breivik’s online fantasy world
Dating psychos like Breivik
Breivik’s social contract betrayal
Breivik’s July 22 Sarajevo Code
Breivik the white knight
Breivik, Christ’s Knight
Stepfamily loners
be proud of your race!
immigration promotes white shame?

See also:

Age Secrets of Anders Behring Breivik
Breivik’s Aquarian Humanity?