UN subverts democracy?

Decca works with an activist organization pressuring the government on several issues and explains how the group subverts democracy by using the United Nations to give authority to their demands.

“The United Nations is the source of all progressive policies in human rights, health and environment since WWII,” says Decca. “The idea of anthropogenic climate change, for instance, came from the UN and through emissions trading it will redistribute wealth and dictate how every citizen of the world will lead their day-to-day lives.”

“The United Nations, itself founded upon a movement for world peace after WWII, is now the means by which activists can attempt to subvert the democratic process and force their beliefs upon recalcitrant home governments by virtue of those governments being members of the UN and signatories to UN Human Rights, Environment and Health directives.”

“UN members are not elected, they are appointed; there is much corruption in their ranks – as there is in home governments; and while UN directives are not yet enforceable (the USA as well as many other home governments have defaulted), there is every possibility that one day will become enforceable by virtue of the UN’s aspiration to be the only government in the world.”

“Once activists gain the ear of an unelected UN member – and convince them of the worth of their cause, as well as the possible enormous wealth to be generated by it in view of the global nature of the activity, the UN makes policy directives and publishes reports and recommendations which it sends to home governments urging adoption of a standard set of legislative control/uncontrol measures.”

“With respect to controlling wealthy industries, measures start small with education in schools (which most industries agree is the 'proper' sort of government response),” explains Decca. “UN directives may then recommend discouraging exposure in schools and public places; and then suggests legal and economic measures to prohibit exposure in both public and private places, to force disclosure of chemical additives in the manufacturing process, to ban advertising and promotion, and, of course, to impose punitive taxes on users and industry – but never, ever, the banning of the product (because the object is to control it, and spread the wealth from its use by citizens to the controlling bodies, as well as its manufacturing and taxing bodies).”

“Because home governments are democratically elected to represent the wishes of the people being governed, most of whom would be engaging in the ‘disgusting activity’, including the politicians themselves,” explains Decca, “the UN’s recommended legislative control measures are seldom enacted, and this is where my group does its real work.”

“As activists, we engineer public support by gaining media attention and in doing so we shame politicians into enacting the UN recommendations.”

Read more by Decca on this issue:

student activism

Media driven social policy

A career as an activist

misuse of 'war' for other issues?

Education and activism

Welfare funding for activists

activist cults and sin taxes

Norway's globalist politicians

The atrocity committed by the Norwegian, Anders Behring Breivik, put the spotlight on a small country that, surprisingly, plays a very large part in global politics; and that the assassin’s target was Gro Harlem Brundtland – currently a Special Envoy on Climate Change for the United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon – caused Dakota to wonder what it was about that lady that Breivik hated so much, and how she ended up as a globalist politician.

“Brundtland, born 20 April 1939, has such an impressive history of achievements that it is easy, perhaps, for any man to envy her or feel emasculated by her – but obviously her husband did not, basking in her reflected glory to such a degree that he wrote two books about her,” says Dakota. “But because Breivik saw feminism –and feminized men - as one of the curses visited upon his country, and the world, by her generation of ‘cultural Marxists’, it is obvious why he made her a prime target for his hate.”

“From the beginning, Brundtland was a strong advocate of women's rights and as the Norwegian Labor Party’s spokesperson on abortion, she enabled law changes liberating women from unwanted pregnancies and domestic servitude,” says Dakota. “Breivik no doubt blamed her for Norway’s low ethnic birth rate and the rise of immigration in his country - a trend common across western nations.”

“In Trygve Bratelli’s Labour government, Brundtland held a post that no woman had ever previously held - environmental minister for the country,” says Dakota, “and this strikes me as odd because her qualifications were in medicine and public health – but when you consider that Breivik listed environmentalists as eco-Marxists whose true agenda is to create a world government led by the UN you can understand why Brundtland moved into that area.”

“As environmental minister – as well as becoming deputy leader in 1975, the International Year of the Woman – she came to prominence in 1977 when an explosion caused a serious spill at an oil drilling platform in the North Sea,” says Dakota. “She made environmental issues –and herself - very prominent for the voters of the country by speaking out against further drilling expansion in the North Sea, and she was also against damming any more rivers to produce hydroelectric power.”

“In 1981 Brundtland became Norway’s first woman prime minister and, at 42, she also became the youngest person to hold that office,” says Dakota, “but she made a mess of things and was thrown out of office within the year, shortly to start a career in global politics.”

“Impressed by her environmental activism, the United Nations Secretary General gave her the job of chairing the World Commission on Environment,” says Dakota, “and among the 21 representatives she chose to form the commission, holding its first meeting in Switzerland in 1984, was a Canadian entrepreneur, Maurice Strong, (now a Beijing resident).”

“In 1986, Brundtland became prime minister of Norway a second time, with 8 of 18 cabinet members being women,” says Dakota, “and in the same year Maurice Strong’s water development company lost in a bid to pump water underground in Colorado which would have caused ‘significant environmental damage to nearby wetland and sand dune ecosystems by reducing the flow of surface water’- so much for his environmental credentials!”

“The last meeting of the World Commission on Environment and Development - aka the Brundtland Commission - took place in 1987 in Japan,” says Dakota. “This commission provided momentum for the infamous Agenda 21 - and it was decided to have another talk fest in five years time at the 1992 Earth Summit in Brazil, headed by Maurice Strong, where leaders from almost 200 countries attended.”

“Breivik’s manifesto quotes Maurice Strong’s opening remarks at the 1992 Earth Summit as proof that environmentalists are Marxists – ‘Isn’t it the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse? Isn’t it part our responsibility to bring that about?’ – and the way they will achieve the West’s downfall is by transferring wealth to the developing nations (i.e. China, where Strong resides) by carbon taxes.”

“In the meantime, Brundtland was re-elected Norwegian prime minister in 1990,” says Dakota, “but her main focus remained on international politics – traveling worldwide promoting environmental issues, population control and the elimination of poverty – the highlight of which came in 1994 she delivered the opening day speech at the UN Population Conference in Egypt.”

“Brundtland’s crowning success in international politics came in 1998 when she was made Director-General of the World Health Organization under Kofi Annan - a post she held until 2003 – despite suffering from uterine cancer in 2002,” says Dakota. “In this post she gained prominence for changing the focus of public health to lifestyle issues and adopting a macroeconomic approach to health – reducing mankind to ‘homo economicus’, nothing more than a worker and a consumer, which is another gripe from Breivik’s manifesto.”

“So, from 1998 to 2003 Brundtland was the prime force behind the worldwide movement to achieve the abolition of cigarette smoking,” explains Dakota, “and under her leadership the WHO became the first employer to discriminate against smokers – a measure which may have affected Breivik, a smoker, personally.”

“At the same time, her good friend, Maurice Strong, became Kofi Annan’s personal envoy but was forced to step down from his post in 2005 after the Oil-for-Food scandal and hiring practice criticisms showed alleged evidence of his corruption.”

In 2007, the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon made Brundtland a UN Special Envoy for Climate Change – a post she continues to hold as well as working for Pepsi as a consultant,” laughs Dakota. “I have to laugh because isn’t there an incongruity between Pepsi and her former role with WHO, especially as Norway ranks 4th in the world for soft drink consumption?”

“Now 72, Brundtland shows no signs of wearying,” says Dakota. “She is a member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters and the Norwegian Humanist Association (the Secretary General of which is Lars Gule, a former leader of the AUF (which the massacred children belonged to) who had been trained in terrorism by the perpetrators of the Maalot Massacre in Israel).

“She is also a member of the Council of Women World Leaders, the Club of Madrid, the Bilderberg meetings, and The Elders (formed by Nelson Mandela on the occasion of his 89th birthday in 2007 and funded by Richard Branson, Peter Gabriel, Ray Chambers, Michael Chambers, Bridgeway Foundation, Pam Omidyar, Humanity United, Amy Robbins, Shashi Ruia, Dick Tarlow and the United Nations Foundation).

“Still married to fellow humanist Arne Olav Brundtland since 1960, she has four children and, like many Norwegian Labour politicians, they own a house in the south of France – as does Breivik’s natural father,” says Dakota, “and it is ironic that she had an operation for uterine cancer in 2002 at a Norwegian hospital when she was resident in France – breaching her ‘homo economicus’ health directive about social security benefits.”

“Bowing to intense media pressure in 2008 about where her allegiances lie, Brundtland has since resumed residence in Norway and intends to repay her health costs,” says Dakota, “but it would have been better for her, and Norway, had she stayed in the south of France rather than continuing her internationalist politics in a land which, under her governance, had contaminated the pure spirit of Norwegian culture with Marxist philosophy and created such a reactionary man as Breivik.”

“A young Breivik, witnessing the rise of Islamism within the western world, but most particularly the complicity of his government in the selling out of fellow Christians in Serbia in 1999, pandering to the Muslims over the Muhammad cartoons and awarding the Peace Prize to Arafat (an Islamic terrorist) saw all of this as the act of traitors.”

“That Brundtland owes her life to a traffic jam – preventing Breivik from reaching her before she gave a speech on Utoya Island to the unfortunate AUF child campers – is something she will no doubt ponder upon for the rest of her life.”

Read more by Dakota:
Was Breivik a secret Israeli operative?
The ethics of politicizing children
Breivik’s online fantasy world
Dating psychos like Breivik
Breivik’s social contract betrayal
Breivik’s July 22 Sarajevo Code
Breivik the white knight
Breivik, Christ’s Knight
Stepfamily loners
be proud of your race!
immigration promotes white shame?

See also:

Age Secrets of Anders Behring Breivik
Breivik’s Aquarian Humanity?

Who voted for WHO?

Becky is concerned that the unelected World Health Organization (WHO) - set up in 1948 as an agency of the unelected United Nations – is setting the agenda for our health budget, wasting taxpayer funds on vanity projects and surreptitiously forcing home governments to accept a globalist policy.

“The WHO is a global organization which by-passes democratic processes and undermines national sovereignty,” says Becky. “Nobody voted for WHO; nobody elected its representatives as overlords of the world’s health; no nation asked for its guidance; and no society had any say in any of the health directives inflicted on their nations by it.”

“The WHO, with its headquarters in Geneva, is not a ‘health’ organization,” says Becky. “It is a medical organization which, from the beginning, pursued an idea of ‘health’ which was very similar to Adolph Hitler’s fanatical ‘healthism’ - and its founding medical members were of the same age as Hitler, too, and shared his hatred of smoking.”

“It is an anachronistic organization representing 1940 ideals which has been inflicted upon, and accepted by, the world almost without question,” says Becky. “And, rather than concentrating on genuine global health problems – the old infectious diseases, malaria, malnutrition, etc which still plague us – one of its very first priorities was a vanity project - to control tobacco smoking - and this priority has continued to the present date unabated despite new pandemics, AIDS, SARS etc and never ending wars and famines.”

“This priority shows that the medical establishment under the auspices of WHO is continuing, this time on a global scale, the policies of the Nazi medical establishment in relation to social domination via the cult of ‘healthism’.”

“Public Health has been used by the UN as a mode of infiltrating nations around the world,” says Becky. “It has stripped nations of their cultural, social and political heritage and aligned them with the vanity projects of an elite medical establishment.”

“In relation to the smoking vanity project, for instance, it was under the auspices of WHO that the Godber Blueprint was established in 1975,” says Becky. “Since then, a global bureaucracy has been built up – at taxpayer’s expense - to protect the original Blueprint and affect its fulfillment.”

“Like many in the medical profession, Godber was a fanatical anti-smoker who made smoking control a moralist ideological crusade,” says Becky. “He said that smoking is a dirty, anti-social practice; that smokers are nicotine addicts; that we should aim to have a non-smoking generation and a non-smoking world by the year 2000; and that waging a war against smoking was a ‘proper’ activity of health departments everywhere.”

“Godber had a narrow, fixed and flawed opinion of smoking as well as a dangerous view of Public Health which, over the decades, has not changed and culminated on 21 May 2003, at the 56th World Health Assembly, with the unanimous adoption of 167 nations of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.”

“This Convention placed governments under international obligation to monitor tobacco use and prevention policies; protect people from tobacco smoke; offer help to quit tobacco use; warn about the dangers of tobacco; enforce bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship; and raise taxes on tobacco (to pay for the WHO’s global monitors, protectors, helpers, warners and enforcers) ,” says Becky. “This confirms my view that WHO is conducting a global moralistic ideological crusade.”

“While the world suffers from the global war on terrorism - and cancer and other health researchers beg for funds to help them cure diseases that are the real global scourges – it is nice to know that the WHO has its priorities right, isn’t it?”

Read more by Becky on this issue:

Bogus health research

Sinful Pleasures

Anti-smoking media tarts

Licensed to smoke?

Le Grand Fag Parasite

self-employment in parasitic britain

parasites and brain drains