July 27, 2011

Breivik, Christ’s Knight

When Dakota read the manifesto of Anders Behring Breivik, it was quite plain that he considered himself to be a Justiciar Knight Commander of the Knights Templar of Europe fighting a war to preserve European Christendom against a Marxist-Islamic alliance, and viewed his massacre not as a spree killing of innocent civilians but a biblical act of retribution against a Norwegian political party that welcomed Muslim immigrants and was therefore anti-Christian.

“Breivik described himself as being 100% Christian and on Day 41 of his countdown preparation for the July 22 massacre he prayed to God for the success of his mission,” says Dakota. “He described the church in Europe as being ‘fanatically egalitarian, self-loathing and suicidal’ – and spiritually bankrupt; and traced the fall of Europe’s Christendom back to events in the late 19th century – particularly Great Britain’s appeasement of Turkey.”

“Great Britain was once Turkey’s most powerful ally,” explains Dakota, “and its so-called Christian politicians sold out fellow Christians living in the Muslim Ottoman Empire, centred in Turkey, in order to safeguard the balance of power in Europe and block Russia from advancing further into Europe.”

“Knowing full well from Consul James Zohrab’s report from Sarajevo in 1860 on July 22 that the Christians living under Muslim rule were being treated very badly, the British politicians allowed the Muslims to get away with the lie that Turkish rule over the Christians in the Ottoman Empire’s European provinces was just, fair, tolerant and lawful.’

“In 1875 Bosnia revolted against Turkish rule and Bulgaria followed in 1876, leading to a massacre of Christians over the Balkans by the Turks,” says Dakota. “Amazingly, Britain defended this massacre and it was Russia that declared war on the Ottoman Empire in 1877-78, defeated the Turks, and assisted Romania, Serbia, and Montenegro to gain independence.”

“In exchange for the strategic island of Cyprus – and the return of two Armenian provinces – Britain promised the defeated Ottoman Empire protection from Russia,” says Dakota, “and as a result of this shameful horse-trading 250,000 Armenians met a terrible fate in 1896.”

“With the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after WWI – and the loss of 1.5 million lives – the British politicians then sold out their fellow Christians in Arab lands by promoting a National Arab Movement in which Muslims and Christians were to live in ‘harmony’ under Arab rule,” says Dakota, “and, fearing for their lives, there followed a stream of Christian refugees from Turkey, Iraq and Syria – and then the Jewish / Palestinian conflict added to the mix.”

“The oppression, massacre and / or displacement of millions of Christians under Muslim rule is something that neither the European powers nor the Muslim world wish to acknowledge,” says Dakota. “It was all swept under the carpet by those with national and economic interest to promote and protect, but it was never forgotten by those that suffered the most – in Armenia and the Baltic states.

“When Breivik’s Norwegian government involved itself in the NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999, killing his Christian ‘brothers’, he believed the time had come for the Knights Templar to plan for the resurrection of European Christendom.”

Read more by Dakota:
Was Breivik a secret Israeli operative?
The ethics of politicizing children
Breivik’s online fantasy world
Breivik’s social contract betrayal
Breivik’s July 22 Sarajevo Code
immigration promotes white shame?
Breivik the white knight
Dating psychos like Breivik
Stepfamily loners
be proud of your race!

See also:

Breivik’s Aquarian Humanity?
Age Secrets of Anders Behring Breivik





Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

   June 25, 2010

swing to communism to create jobs?

Cheryl is concerned about the rise of welfare and nanny states in response to the global financial crisis and massive immigration and unemployment, and believes that there will ultimately be a swing to communism in order to create jobs for all.

"For all its faults, communism had one good point," says Cheryl. “It's mantra was no work, no food - and that should be our mantra, too."

"Germany was the first of the European nations to crack down on welfare - forcing people to work for less than regular wages - and good for them," says Cheryl. "Forced labor might stick in the craw of native Germans but it is a measure that will surely stop a lot of freeloading immigrants and refugees from wanting to live in Germany."

"In time the rest of the EU and the rest of the western world will have to follow Germany's lead," says Cheryl, "because the welfare cash cow is drying up. Given the choice of forced work in the cities for low wages or return to the land and fend for themselves, I'd expect a lot of people - including the refugees -- will decide they are better off being peasants than slum dwellers."

"I believe welfare - except for the genuinely needy - should be abolished because it attracts freeloaders from other countries and promotes a 'soft', dependent population," says Cheryl. "Responsibility should be sheeted home to families to take care of their own - making people think twice before having a third, fourth or fifth child, and far more encouragement and facilitation should he given to unemployed people to start their own businesses, to create their own jobs, even if it is just street entertainment or car washing."

"There may be very few regular jobs these days, but there is always something that people can do if given a hard enough incentive -- such as no more welfare," explains Cheryl. "Give these people the use of a block of land with a few chickens and a real cow - rather than a cash cow - and force them to take care of themselves!"

Read more from Cheryl on this subject:

  • the welfare cash cow
  • immigrants and cash cows





  • Labels: , , , , ,

       June 11, 2010

    government and its corporate mates

    From the beginnings of politics, the tactic of divide and rule has been used by the ruling classes of whatever persuasion to entrench their power, privilege and wealth and Leona sees it first hand in her return-to-work job with a global corporation, a great mate of the government.

    “By demonizing the Jews, the Nazis and allied German companies gained public support for stealing the wealth and property of Jews all over Europe, and by demonizing the Saddam regime the Bush government and its corporate mates gained support for stealing the oil fields and marching over Iraq,” says Leona. “It’s only by demonizing a defined group of people that whole populations can be distracted from what is really going on, and in my workplace it’s a defined racial group that is being targeted in order to divide and rule us.”

    “It’s no good that we say sorry, we didn’t know this was going on, like the post-war Germans did when faced with bodies and gas ovens,” says Leona. “When we participate in divide and rule politics by swallowing propaganda and lies we are as guilty as the ruling class and that is why it is such a diabolically effective tactic.”

    “The government gives away power to everyone but the voters and tax payers who – in keeping with the divide and rule tactic – they are trying to hoodwink by encouraging us to blame each other – but particularly immigrants,” says Leona, “and if things get out of hand, they then change from bad cop to good cop and give us bread and circuses.”

    “Social fragmentation - caused by overcrowding and excessive competition brought on by excessive immigration - benefits the elites, not us,” says Leona, “and the more we struggle to survive under intolerable circumstances the less likely we are to notice what should be bleeding obvious.”

    “While we’re working harder and longer to make less money, our taxes are skyrocketing, our rights are diminishing daily, our relationships are deteriorating and our environment is becoming more polluted and violent – and guess what?” says Leona. “The rich in government and their mates in corporations are getting richer!”

    Read more by Leona on this issue:



  • immigrants aren’t the enemy



  • corporations destroying racial harmony



  • global corporation divide and rule



  • united action



  • educating co-workers




  • Labels: , , , , ,

    demographic engineering

    Like many western people of the Boomer generation, Poppy grew up in a predominantly WASP neighborhood – now anything but – and was so naive about the secret demographic engineering being planned by her government that anyone different coming into town was embraced, fussed about and made to feel welcome.

    “Nearly sixty years later the demography of my neighborhood has reversed,” says Poppy, “and I mourn my loss of identity, my innocence and my trust in the governments I elect.”

    "I am angry that successive governments have allowed so many diverse people into our country," says Poppy. "The multicultural thing may have been cool back in the sixties – when there was one of them to thousands of us – but now that there are thousands of them to one of us in some neighborhoods the situation is deplorable and you get to ask what the hell have our governments done?"

    "I’d like to believe that some idealistic idiots in government decided that our society would be enriched by racial and religious diversity, and didn't properly think out the consequences,” says Poppy. “But something tells me that this demographic engineering had demonic intentions.”

    “The intention,” I believe, “was to weaken our social cohesion and bring in a world government.”

    "They may claim 'it's demography, stupid!' but it's not," says Poppy. "There are enemies without our government who have deliberately engineered the demography of our nation via their religiously motivated wars and we, the people, who elected these idiots by means of a social contract are now left with the short straw."

    Read more by Poppy on this issue:

  • engineered demographics

  • the fate of indigenous populations

  • religiously motivated wars

  • the curse of the katholikos ethos

  • katholikos is Greek for global

  • racism and the religious balance

  • the enemy within






  • Labels: , , , , ,

       February 21, 2008

    the curse of the katholikos ethos

    Despite the legal separation of the church from government, Poppy believes that the katholikos ethos is very much alive and kicking in our governing bodies and that it holds as much sway in determining policies as it ever did, and is cursing us as much as it ever did.

    “The Soviet Union was ostensibly atheist,” says Poppy, “but the Orthodox Church of Russia never died out, and indeed continued to pull strings.”

    “It’s the same in even the most socialist of our governments,” says Poppy. “Politicians pretend to be freethinkers or even atheist, but none of them rose to prominence without the power of an almighty organization behind them.”

    “The policies of our elected governments are mostly in synch with Church edicts,” says Poppy, “and when conflicts of interests arise the politicians always have the men in frocks to whisper into their ears and absolve them of their sins."

    “Most parliamentary sessions start and end with prayer,” says Poppy, “and most officials swear on a Bible. Why is this done if there was, indeed, true separation?”

    “If the Pope in Rome is the head of the universal Catholic Church, which is higher than any government and upholds the original Greek katholikos ethos,” says Poppy, “then the God Bods in government are not representing us, or our wishes, but that of their true masters and the end result will be a world government.”

    Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

       August 16, 2007

    the right to live in peace


    After its longest continuous military campaign in its history (38 years) the British Army supposedly left Northern Ireland July 31 2007, but by leaving 5,000 soldiers to ‘keep the peace’ Regan believes that the ‘troubles’ are by no means over and any peace that must be maintained by a military presence is no peace at all and Ireland should reunite.

    "A military force is for defense against enemies, not our own people," says Regan, "and while Middle Eastern terrorists are infiltrating into Europe, coming as immigrants, refugees or even doctors, the British government is doing a lousy job in protecting its citizens from the ‘real’ threat.”

    "According to the social contract, we all have a right to live in peace and, because it’s the majority who rules in democracy, Ireland belongs to the Irish, not the British," says Regan. "The British should have given Northern Ireland back to Ireland and re-settled all those who didn't want the Union into comparable homes and jobs in England."

    "Bigoted people will always be among us,” says Regan, “but even bigots believe in democracy and the western way of life and when faced with the prospect of our government allowing people who hate everything about us into our country, living next door to us and imposing their values on us, we should bury our petty differences and elect to government people who have our interests at heart -- not the interests of the Arab oil lords."

    Read more by Regan:
  • Irish troubles
  • cementing global ties
  • time to return to ireland?
  • catholics vs. protestants
  • bigoted neighbors
  • Irish sectarian conflict


  • Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,