demographic engineering

Like many western people of the Boomer generation, Poppy grew up in a predominantly WASP neighborhood – now anything but – and was so naive about the secret demographic engineering being planned by her government that anyone different coming into town was embraced, fussed about and made to feel welcome.

“Nearly sixty years later the demography of my neighborhood has reversed,” says Poppy, “and I mourn my loss of identity, my innocence and my trust in the governments I elect.”

"I am angry that successive governments have allowed so many diverse people into our country," says Poppy. "The multicultural thing may have been cool back in the sixties – when there was one of them to thousands of us – but now that there are thousands of them to one of us in some neighborhoods the situation is deplorable and you get to ask what the hell have our governments done?"

"I’d like to believe that some idealistic idiots in government decided that our society would be enriched by racial and religious diversity, and didn't properly think out the consequences,” says Poppy. “But something tells me that this demographic engineering had demonic intentions.”

“The intention,” I believe, “was to weaken our social cohesion and bring in a world government.”

"They may claim 'it's demography, stupid!' but it's not," says Poppy. "There are enemies without our government who have deliberately engineered the demography of our nation via their religiously motivated wars and we, the people, who elected these idiots by means of a social contract are now left with the short straw."

Read more by Poppy on this issue:

engineered demographics

the fate of indigenous populations

religiously motivated wars

the curse of the katholikos ethos

katholikos is Greek for global

racism and the religious balance

the enemy within

commonwealth guinea-pigs?

In a short time -- on July 1st 2007 to be precise -- the UK will have completed enacting smoking bans that it first tested on its commonwealth cousins in Canada and Australia almost a decade ago, and Marrielle is hoping that these bans will fail miserably because social life in the cold and hot extremities of Her Majesty's Commonwealth has degenerated dramatically since the bans and she wants to return home permanently to a sane community.

"I've been overseas on and off since I left school, backpacking and working in various places, and generally avoiding northern winters," says Marrielle. "When I've been home in the past it's just to touch base -- say hello to my family, and catch up with old friends -- and during these visits I've increasingly noticed the differences rather than the similarities between the UK and the commonwealth nations."

"Sure, both nations were forged by British immigrants -- mostly convicts in Australia's case -- and there's hardly a family in the UK that doesn't have a relative in Canada or Australia," says Marrielle, "but the old deference to the UK -- the colonial cringe mentality -- is breaking down."

"I think that just about every new social engineering policy that Westminster thinks up gets tested in Canada or Australia before it's foisted on the people at home," says Marrielle. "It's almost as if we've been using these commonwealth countries as guinea-pigs, and they don't like it."

"I'm ready to come home permanently because I don't feel as welcome in the commonwealth countries as I once did," explains Marrielle, "and also because their governments are becoming repressive -- far more so than in the UK -- and people here do blame the UK for all the changes they've had to put up with."

"Because their populations are minuscule compared with ours, Canada and Australia provide an ideal social laboratory for testing new laws that the UK eventually wants to bring in at home," says Marrielle, "and people here don't like being guinea pigs."

"I believe that some of the social experiments carried out in Canada and Australia are not going to wash in the UK -- at least I hope so -- because of geography and ethnic mixes."

"You could drop the UK in the middle of Canada or Australia and it wouldn't make a dent," laughs Marrielle. "Both countries are absolutely h-u-g-e, nobody thinks twice about traveling a hundred miles or more to a party, and because of their land masses the people are really not as cohesive as we are in the UK."

"What social experiments am I talking about? Well, two that come to mind are raising the age of retirement (and eligibility for pension) for women from 60 to 65 -- which came into force in Australia a few years ago; and the draconian smoking bans which came into force in both commonwealth countries much earlier."

"Because the number of women affected by the raised age of retirement in Australia is very small, the change has not caused riots in the street," explains Marrielle, "but imagine its affect in the UK. When I told my mother she freaked out and said that they wouldn't dare bring that law into England. I bet they will, and there's even talk of raising the retirement age for both men and women to 70 (another Westminster experiment soon to take affect?)"

"The smoking bans as tested in Canada and Australia have had a mixed reception," says Marrielle. "In the big cities, where most people huddle, there has been a considerable backlash but people have settled down begrudgingly over the years to the new draconian regime."

"Everywhere else, though, life goes on as usual and people couldn't give a stuff about the smoking bans," laughs Marrielle. "So, if the UK government thinks that its non-smoking experiment in these countries will relate to the UK -- especially England -- then I believe it is in for a big surprise."

"The big cities in Canada and especially Australia have a FAR greater proportion of immigrants than our big cities do and this matters," explains Marrielle, "because their immigrants are vastly different to ours in ethnicity, social class and compliancy. They do what they are told to do without hesitation."

"I don't smoke myself, thank God for small mercies," laughs Marrielle, "but my boyfriend does and he agrees that there are far too many smokers in the UK -- far too many people generally, and far too many smoking immigrants -- for the smoking ban to work in the UK as well as it SEEMS to have done in Canada and Australia."

"Besides which," laughs Marrielle, "since when have the English been slaves to Westminster? It's supposed to be the other way around, isn't it?"

"Let the Irish, Scots and Welsh do what they want to do," says Marrielle, "they're a law unto themselves and good luck to them. We English have a reputation of freedom to uphold and we're not going to let Labour's Nanny State dictate to us about what we can and cannot do in the same manner it seems to dictate to the commonwealth governments."

"By the time my boyfriend and I come home permanently I hope Labour has been kicked out on the issue of the smoking bans -- if not it's proposed surrender of what's left of Britain's sovereignty to the EU constitution," says Marrielle. "There are many ex-pat Brits around the world who desperately want to return to a recognizable homeland."

"I can't imagine my local pub without smokers," says Marrielle. "It didn't bother me when the smoking bans changed the local scene in other countries because it was alien to me to start off with, but it will most definitely affect us if we return and find a lot of prissy non-smokers hogging our local pub."

"Because my boyfriend smokes and I don't we've already discovered the joys, not, of trying to find accommodation that allows smoking," sighs Marrielle. "Sure, it would be easier if he quit, but he wouldn't be same person, he wouldn't be the person I love."

"I don't see how Westminster has any right to interfere in our private lives like this -- and especially so the private lives of people in commonwealth countries," adds Marrielle, "and the sooner we get back to a good old-fashioned Tory government the better."

"It's not that I don't think the commonwealth countries are capable of enacting laws of their own -- after all Canada was smart enough to keep out of the War on Terror," says Marrielle, "it's just that I truly believe these countries are being used as guinea-pigs for social experiments by the UK if not the USA."

"On the smoking issue, particularly, it is far too fishy that Canada and Australia enacted the bans about the same time -- and now the UK is going ahead with them full-steam."

"Don't tell me that these countries are the trend-setters and the UK is following them?" laughs Marrielle. "Of course not, and there's plenty of talk that the UK is still sending its 'convicts' to Australia and generally using the commonwealth countries to hide persons of interest."

"Another big issue the commonwealth countries have that the UK doesn't have is the indigenous populations," says Marrielle. "In both Canada and Australia the indigenous populations are becoming a vocal force, and even without the smoking bans (that they laugh at) they are fed up with white people telling them what they can and cannot do and see white settlement as a scourge."

"Scared of their indigenous populations -- and guilty about what they did to them in the past -- perhaps the commonwealth countries need the UK to continue being Big Brother for a long time into the future," adds Marrielle, "but if I were a citizen of Canada or Australia I'd be mending fences by joining forces with the indigenous people against the UK (not aggressively, of course) and going for a republic."

"Who knows what nasty social experiment the UK may foist on you next?"

silent majorities and protection rackets

According to Melody, the trouble with democracy is that it works on the principle of majority rule but majorities are always silent and sheep-like and the only people who gain from the system are rich minority groups with politicians in their pockets.

"In all governments -- democratic or not -- the deal is this," explains Melody. "We'll take care of you, we'll handle all the tough stuff, trust us. Give us your money and all you have to do is go about your daily life and abide by the laws we make for your good."

"It sounds like a reasonable deal -- a neat social contract -- doesn't it?" laughs Melody. "But it's nothing more than a massive protection racket."

"Very few of the laws governments pass are for our good," says Melody, "and very few of the baddies they are protecting us from are out to get us."

"On the contrary, most of the laws governments pass are for the good of vested interests, not us" says Melody, "and most of the baddies they are protecting us from are out to get these vested interests, not us."

"You only have to look at the situation in Iraq to see the truth of this," says Melody. "Saddam Hussein's regime may have been brutal in comparison to ours, but he kept law and order in a country that doesn't have a silent majority of sheep like ours does."

"The invasion of Iraq was nothing more than a bully boy tactic -- one gang leader moving in on the lucrative turf of another gang leader," says Melody. "On the pretext of weapons of mass destruction -- and then the democratic rights of Iraqi people -- our government fooled our silent majority sheep that Iraq was a danger to us."

"The vested interests like Halliburton and Big Oil have made a killing out of the Iraq invasion," sighs Melody, "and the silent majority sheep still send their children to be slaughtered in a war which never was, and never will be, for our good."

"Our government, led by whatever party and whatever vested interest, has a bloody history of using the silent majority sheep to line the pockets of the rich and powerful," says Melody. "Even the American Revolution was started by the rich tea merchants of Boston. It was easy to whip up hatred for the king and the Westminster parliament among the rag-taggle refugees from mother England, but essentially they just changed one political master for another."

"In 1915, during WWI, a terrible influenza epidemic -- Spanish Flu -- swept around the world and millions dropped dead like flies and yet the war went on regardless," says Melody. "The real enemy -- the real focus of our government -- should have been this bug, but it wasn't. Why? Because governments have always been more concerned about the economic interests of a vested minorities than the health interests of the majority sheep."

"It's tragic that the only system of government -- communism -- that held out any hope for a people rather than a money focused economy was also usurped by the racketeers," sighs Melody. "In it's pure form, a communist community would be living in heaven, not the hell their greedy leaders dumped them in."

"What's happening right now in China, for instance, is scary," says Melody. "In their efforts to catch up with the West, the new economic masters are turning China into a polluted and disease-prone wasteland."

"With globalization, more of our food is coming from parts of the world that have no health regulations," says Melody, "and more of our immigrants are coming -- and going -- from these places, too."

"I'm concerned about our government cutting back on health measures in order to fund its vested interest wars and vested interest causes," says Melody. "I believe another pandemic is coming and our government -- paid by the silent majority to protect it -- is deliberately playing down this threat while stocking up the bunkers that are going to save them, not us."

"I look at all the anti-terror laws the government is passing and wonder whether their real purpose is to erode our freedoms and make us incapable of acting to save ourselves when the crunch comes," says Melody. "Are the security cameras, phone taps, strip searches, background checks and incredible delays in getting anything done or going anywhere really to protect us from terrorists?"

"Terrorists, or freedom-fighters, have been with us since our freedoms were first threatened," says Melody. "No great cause -- be it Christianity, democracy, slavery or whatever -- was achieved without terrorism and bloodshed."

"I don't want to focus my argument entirely on Iraq," says Melody, "because the whole war over there is being used as a smokescreen to hide what's happening here."

"One by one our freedoms are being demolished and the silent sheep like majority are not only being fleeced but led over a precipice," warns Melody. "Right now, apart from the big vested interests, certain minority vested interests are also driving the government. Some things once unacceptable are now acceptable -- such as homosexuality -- and some things once acceptable are now unacceptable -- such as smoking."

"The silent majority go along with whatever the government does because that's the deal, that's the social contract," says Melody. "They hug the homosexuals they once despised, and despise the smokers they once hugged."

"With a change in government, who knows what minority vested interests will next drive the country?" asks Melody. "Will we be hugging Arabs and despising Jews? Kissing paedophiles and spitting at SUV owners or gun owners?"

"The point to be made is that we are being socially engineered -- even genetically modified like Monsanto's food," says Melody, "and if we must be subject to a government run protection racket then why should we remain silent about what we want to be protected from?"

"I believe we have more chance of being killed by a simple flu virus than by trans fat, SUV pollution, global warning, cigarette smoke, a terrorist's bomb or a crazed gun owner," says Melody, "and we should all demand that our taxpayer dollars go into measures designed to stop these bugs getting into our country."